• Home
  • Articles
    • Firearm Rights
    • Practical Advice
    • Real-World Scenarios
    • General Discussion
    • Comic Relief
    • Reviews
    • Archive
  • Business Directory
  • Shop
    • View All Products
    • Basket
    • My account
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
  • What is Paratus?

Social Media

Latest Posts

View

Disarming Victims Won’t Fix our Violent Crime Crisis

February 22, 2023

View

Gun Owners Are Not to Blame for Mass Shootings

February 8, 2023

View

Are Old Handgun Combatives Instructors Still Relevant?

January 13, 2023

View

Reliability, Ergonomics & Lumens – Choosing your EDC Torch

September 23, 2022

 
0
Paratus
The Truth is our Weapon
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Firearm Rights
    • Practical Advice
    • Real-World Scenarios
    • General Discussion
    • Comic Relief
    • Reviews
    • Archive
  • Business Directory
  • Shop
    • View All Products
    • Basket
    • My account
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
  • What is Paratus?
Paratus
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Firearm Rights
    • Practical Advice
    • Real-World Scenarios
    • General Discussion
    • Comic Relief
    • Reviews
    • Archive
  • Business Directory
  • Shop
    • View All Products
    • Basket
    • My account
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
  • What is Paratus?
0

In Firearm Rights, General Discussion

The Dedicated versus the dedicated

September 21, 2017 7 Comments

The Dedicated versus the dedicated

The Firearms Control Act, 60 of 2000 (FCA) has brought with it a term that proved to dominate many a firearms-related debate in the years after its implementation.

Starting in the definitions, the terms “dedicated hunter” and “dedicated sports person” soon became talking points, loosely referred to as DSS, or “dedicated shooter status”.

The reason, of course, being section 16 of the aforementioned act, which allows a person with DSS to possess more firearms than the general limitation of four.

Soon it became clear that it was not all that difficult to become such a dedicated hunter or sports person. Compliance with the act in this regard was (and is) not an insurmountable barrier to entry, and soon enough a vast amount of shooters became “dedicated”.

And this is where the politics of semantics began.

You see, “dedicated” has different meanings.

The drafters of FCA has thought it prudent to give definition to their idea of a “dedicated” shooter, by codifying it in the act. Hunting and sporting organisations can apply for accreditation from the SAPS (who are the administrators of the FCA), and once accredited, can “award” DSS to their members, subject to compliance with their internal procedures.

It is important to note that the SAPS have accredited – approved – these organisations. When an organisation grants DSS to a member, that member is now considered a dedicated shooter in terms of the FCA. And qualifies for the extra privileges afforded by the act.

Said member does not have to do a thing more. There are no degrees of dedication for the purposes envisioned by the FCA.

It is simply a gun-control technique written into the FCA by which more control is exerted over those who wish to possess firearms. And once complied with, its relevance must not be overstated.

“Dedicated”, in its plain language meaning, can be defined as being devoted to a task or purpose. This is a whole different kettle of fish.

Degrees of dedication are surely present. Some pistol shooters may scoff at another that shoots 1000 rounds per year, while they are pushing 20 000 or more. They, in turn, may be surprised that the likes of Vogel et al probably shoots that amount per month.

Some may spend an hour each day dry firing and practicing shooting-specific skills. Another may only take out his sporting gun from the safe every time he intends to participate in a match.

It is patently clear that the one is more dedicated than the other.

The problem that occurs is one of semantics. We have seen a clouding of the issues, because the words are the same. We have seen sporting and hunting organisations slated because obtaining (and maintaining) DSS with them was seen as “too easy”. i.e., “You cannot possibly be afforded the same privileges as I am, because I am more dedicated than you”. Or “Your organisation makes it too easy”. And “We are all at risk of losing our guns because your organisation’s rules aren’t as onerous as mine”.

The clichés of the “circular firing squad” and “we are own worst enemy” come to mind. We are quick to shout “Molon Labe!” but quicker to throw our own in front of the bus.

Regardless of the differences between the internal procedures of organisations, if they are accredited they are accredited: nobody is being thrown under the bus because one organisation is just less onerous and more user-friendly than another.

There is nothing wrong with being proud of your dedication to the sport. In fact outstanding results are only achieved by the truly dedicated, those that put in the time, money, effort and personal sacrifice into their chosen sport. It is commendable and must not be put down in any shape or form.

And yet, similarly, it must not be confused with the gun-control tactic of the FCA. Your dedication to your chosen shooting discipline cannot be used as an argument against the requirements of an organisation, accredited by SAPS, in line with their mandate to administer and enforce the FCA, purely because the drafters chose the term “dedicated”.

Become dedicated. Be proud of it. Do not be tempted to be proud of your FCA-enforced “dedicated” status. And do not confuse the two.


Written by Phillip Marais.

Phillip is a forum moderator, sport shooter and general know-it-all. Coming from a legal background, he fancies himself knowledgeable on gun rights. He detests generalisations, and thinks that Glock is better than CZ.

Share

7

  1. Brittius
    •
    5 years ago

    Reblogged this on .

  2. Stephen Palos
    •
    5 years ago

    Well said!

  3. Barry
    •
    5 years ago

    Perfectly clear, and well put. People forget that someone who can only afford to shoot 50 rounds every other month – and shoot it, is still just as dedicated as the person who can afford to shoot 20,000 rounds a month, who can afford it (or gets sponsored). Everyone has different backgrounds and different financial allowances. The shooting community definitely needs to moderate itself in this regard.

  4. tinusd
    •
    5 years ago

    I think the distinction between “dedicated according to the act” and “dedicated to the sport” is important here.

    I’m very proud to be dedicated to my sport. I go to a lot of trouble to take part and I spend a lot of money (more than I should) to do so. I firmly believe that you cannot beat someone who works harder at the game than you do.

    Having said that, I also believe the FCA is a deliberate effort to make firearm ownership as difficult and illogical as possible. This includes the drivel of allowing a sports organisation to decide whether I can own more than four firearms and 20 brazilian rounds of ammunition.

    Ceterum censeo FCA esse delendam

  5. Keith
    •
    5 years ago

    Very well written. Thanks

  6. Shane
    •
    5 years ago

    Well said! I think if you are a shooter of 50 rds or 2000 rds per month you are dedicated enough! We need to learn to respect each other & support our sport weather it is hunting, pins, IDPA or IPSC or what ever your chosen discipline is! Only in this way, together as “shooters” will we gain the needed ground & numbers to change the ludicrous laws we are faced with as shooters.

  7. Zoo Keeper
    •
    5 years ago

    Dedicated status is a gun control tactic. Next is: “how is it that someone could own 20 guns?” and so the control tightens. Get them used to some control, then control some more, then some more, then some more.

    People should simply be able to own how many they like without having to justify their choices to anyone, least of all the police.

Previous Post

Martin Hood's Presentation to…

In Firearm Rights

Martin Hood's Presentation to the PPC

View Post

Next Post

The Curse of the Workshop…

In Practical Advice

The Curse of the Workshop Warrior

View Post

About Paratus

Paratus

Paratus is a platform where you can read about the latest developments at the sharp-edge of the South African gun ownership debate.

Boeretroos Koffie

Social Media

Subscribe

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Popular Posts

View

Reliability, Ergonomics & Lumens – Choosing your EDC Torch

September 23, 2022

View

Gun Owners Are Not to Blame for Mass Shootings

February 8, 2023

View

Disarming Victims Won’t Fix our Violent Crime Crisis

February 22, 2023

View

Are Old Handgun Combatives Instructors Still Relevant?

January 13, 2023

Paratus

© 2023 Paratus - All Rights Reserved.