• Home
  • Articles
    • Firearm Rights
    • Practical Advice
    • Real-World Scenarios
    • General Discussion
    • Comic Relief
    • Reviews
    • Archive
  • Business Directory
  • What is Paratus?

Social Media

Latest Posts

View

The UK’s Handgun Ban: A reactive policy that failed

December 19, 2025

View

You Are Always the First Responder

August 30, 2025

View

Martin Hood responds to the Daily Maverick

August 27, 2025

View

Revisiting the Grey Man

May 11, 2025

 
Paratus
The Truth is our Weapon
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Firearm Rights
    • Practical Advice
    • Real-World Scenarios
    • General Discussion
    • Comic Relief
    • Reviews
    • Archive
  • Business Directory
  • What is Paratus?
Paratus
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Firearm Rights
    • Practical Advice
    • Real-World Scenarios
    • General Discussion
    • Comic Relief
    • Reviews
    • Archive
  • Business Directory
  • What is Paratus?

In Archive

Fuzzy Logic Strikes Again

November 20, 2014 6 Comments

Fuzzy Logic Strikes Again

I take issue with Vanessa Farr’s opinion piece “Staring Down the Barrel of a Gun” in the 19 November Daily Maverick.

In her article she makes a rather bold claim that licenced firearm owners have over 50 guns a day stolen from them, according to statistics obviously. I have searched and inquired as to the validity of these damning statistics, but alas I have had no luck. Nor have any of my contemporaries. Dr Farr unfortunately neglected to provide any links to source material from which these statistics originate, which leaves me with no option but to conclude that she has made them up. I deduce that she bases her allegation that civilians lose eight times as many firearms as police upon these invented findings, in which case they are very much untrue.

Dr Farr also elects to ignore the significance of the social, economic, biological, and psychological causes of crime, and rather chooses to place all the blame directly on guns alone: “Because of guns, one sporting hero is dead, another disgraced and imprisoned; and South Africa now has a reputation as a holiday destination for those who wish to commit murder by proxy.” I think it is exceptionally insulting to those who suffer the consequences of crime in our society to trivialise the issue in this manner.

Crime is a complicated and perplexing social problem. Its causes are numerous and obfuscated, and its existence has left philosophers, scientists, and legislators searching for a solution since the dawn of civilisation. I am no criminologist, but I do advise Dr Farr to expand her reading upon the subject some more before making such flippant commentary in future.

What would Dr Farr say to all the South Africans who managed to successfully fend off violent criminals through armed resistance? Should their lives be forfeit because she does not deem them worthy of possessing the means with which to protect themselves? What of the thousands of South Africans murdered each year by use of something other than a firearm; are their deaths less significant because they were not slain by a firearm wielding murderer?

Our borders are porous, and it is estimated that thousands of struggle-era firearms are still in circulation to date. None of our security forces were issued with AK47s, thus the only source that armed robbers like these can procure their weapons from is across the border. In addition to thousands of police firearms lost, stolen and transferred through corruption to criminals, hundreds of thousands of firearms from the previous homelands are still unaccounted for.

It is patently obvious that we will never live in a gun free South Africa.

If Dr Farr is serious about tackling the crime and violence problem faced by all South Africans, than she should start by campaigning against corruption within our State Departments. Only when our police service and our judiciary are empowered to effectively and efficiently perform their duties, can the authorities ever hope to turn the tide against violence and crime.

Until then I propose a more pragmatic approach: arm and train every responsible citizen in this country, men and women, so that they may stand a fighting chance against those who seek to do them harm.

crimefearfirearm ownershipfirearm rightsgun controlgun control failuregun free south africagun rightsincompetenceviolence
Share

6

You may also like

View Post

Self-Defence Gun Ban – The Government Wants You Murdered

View Post

It is time to change our gun laws – licence the person

View Post

South Africa’s Road to Communism – Gun Owners on the Front Line

View Post

When Security Theatre leads to Racial Profiling

View Post

Hard Lessons from Uvalde

View Post

Fire Bheki Cele – Now is the Time for Ramaphosa to Act

View Post

HuntEx and the journey forward

View Post

GFSA get their facts spectacularly wrong. Again. Still.

Previous Post

Carry Your Darn Gun

In Archive

Carry Your Darn Gun

View Post

Next Post

Langalibalele's Rifles: the Legacy of…

In Archive

Langalibalele's Rifles: the Legacy of Colonialism

View Post

About Paratus

Paratus

Paratus is a platform where you can read about the latest developments at the sharp-edge of the South African gun ownership debate.

Boeretroos Koffie

Social Media

Popular Posts

View

You Are Always the First Responder

August 30, 2025

View

The UK’s Handgun Ban: A reactive policy that failed

December 19, 2025

View

Martin Hood responds to the Daily Maverick

August 27, 2025

Paratus

© 2026 Paratus - All Rights Reserved.