• Home
  • Articles
    • Firearm Rights
    • Practical Advice
    • Real-World Scenarios
    • General Discussion
    • Comic Relief
    • Reviews
    • Archive
  • Business Directory
  • Shop
    • View All Products
    • Basket
    • My account
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
  • What is Paratus?

Social Media

Latest Posts

View

Revisiting the Grey Man

May 11, 2025

View

PSIRA Amendments will Destroy Security Industry

April 3, 2025

View

Are Iron Sights Obsolete?

November 29, 2024

View

Are Civilian Firearm Owners a Source of Guns for Criminals?

November 27, 2024

 
0
Paratus
The Truth is our Weapon
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Firearm Rights
    • Practical Advice
    • Real-World Scenarios
    • General Discussion
    • Comic Relief
    • Reviews
    • Archive
  • Business Directory
  • Shop
    • View All Products
    • Basket
    • My account
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
  • What is Paratus?
Paratus
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Firearm Rights
    • Practical Advice
    • Real-World Scenarios
    • General Discussion
    • Comic Relief
    • Reviews
    • Archive
  • Business Directory
  • Shop
    • View All Products
    • Basket
    • My account
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
  • What is Paratus?
0

In Firearm Rights

GOSA versus SAPS – Civil Rights meets Firearm Rights

July 26, 2018 6 Comments

GOSA versus SAPS – Civil Rights meets Firearm Rights

Tomorrow Gun Owners of SA (GOSA) face-off against the SAPS in the North Gauteng High Court. What is it all about this time? Well, for one it is to interdict the police from confiscating private property of people who sit with expired firearm licences, and to prevent these citizens from being criminalised. Secondly, the urgent application forms the foundation of a legal challenge against the concept of relicensing as whole. Seeing that the advertised purpose of relicensing is more than adequately covered by numerous other sections of the FCA, it serves no purpose except to create an unsurmountable administrative burden.

It would appear that the SAPS are perpetually being sued by the public. This is not an inaccurate perception. In the 2015/16 financial year civil claims against the SAPS exceeded R14.6 billion. Back in 2013 the R14 billion claim mark was first breeched, and it looks to have now become a regular occurrence. 

Why are citizens suing the police to this extent? Because members of the SAPS indulge in unlawful arrest, assault, rape, robbery, and a whole smorgasbord of other illegal activities in which they victimise the public. The exact same public they are tasked with protecting. Jacques Pauw was not indulging in hyperbole when he referred to the SAPS as the most corrupt organ of state.

So, how did we get to this point? Let us do a quick refresher and recap.

The ConCourt aftermath and subsequent process

In the aftermath of the Constitutional Court ruling regarding expired firearm licences, the SAPS gave a presentation to the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Policing on 14 June. In this presentation the SAPS committed to an extensive stakeholder engagement process.

The purpose of this process was to consult with firearm owners and their representative organisations. These consultations would map a way forward to avoid the already untenable situation transforming into a complete disaster. Frankly put, the criminalisation of over 400 000 people and the confiscation of their property presents an unparalleled catastrophe.

Thus this engagement process between SAPS legal services and legal representatives of GOSA started shortly after the PPC presentation. Unfortunately the process derailed nearly completely within two weeks.

The Self-Destructo Bust and immediate response

Why did this process self-destruct?

SAPS spokespeople continued to issue daily public communications which threatened expired licence holders with arrest and confiscation of their property. They also insisted on proclaiming that those possessing a so-called “Green Card” licence would not be safe from potential prosecution. These are the exact same licences which Judge Prinsloo ordered as being valid indefinitely in his 2009 judgement. Additionally various provincial SAPS offices issued confusing and conflicting directives to pave the way for the imminent confiscation of firearms.

All of this occurred while the GOSA legal team were engaging with SAPS legal services. When GOSA queried what the intentions of the police were, and why they insisted in conducting a media campaign of threats and coercion against the public, they received no answer.

Basically, the situation had now deteriorated and become intolerable. GOSA needed to take urgent action to stop it from becoming a full-blown crisis.

GOSA served the SAPS with their papers on 6 July.

In their answering affidavit the SAPS conceded the following important points:

  • Unequivocal acknowledgement that all (without any exceptions) “Green Card” and ID book licences are valid.
  • Confirmation that people with expired licences will not be arrested or prosecuted.
  • Confirmation that people can renew their expired licences late, “on good cause shown”.
  • Details of their proposed plan forward.

It is obvious that the SAPS is completely schizophrenic. Under oath they admit that all Green Card licences are valid, yet in the media they tell the public a different story. The police also claim that they will not arrest or prosecute anybody, yet they continue to threaten and bluster from morning until night. The admission that people with expired licences can indeed renew them is also surprising: what on earth is all the fuss about then?

SAPS schizophrenia and other diseases

Adding to this bizarre bout of mental illness suffered by the police, Minister Bheki Cele this week announced his introduction of a firearm amnesty to Parliament. Apparently with the intent in solving the crisis. Despite the fact that amnesties need to go through a lengthy process of parliamentary approval, and therefore we won’t be seeing one in operation anytime soon. For some this may appear to be welcome news. The FCA after all requires that those who surrender their legally owned guns during the amnesty must be allowed the opportunity to apply for a licence. 

I have never heard of this resulting in a successful application before. What I have witnessed, is thousands of firearm handed in during previous amnesties being sold to criminals by the police. And these criminals committing more than a thousand murders with these guns. Guns that were once safe and sound in civilian possession.

We are at a gun rights / civil rights crossroads

How on earth the SAPS plan on taking possession (and safeguarding) over 400 000 firearms and more than 60 million rounds of ammunition is anyone’s guess. But even if only a fraction of these weapons and ammunition end up in criminal hands it would present an unprecedented public safety crisis. The last thing responsible firearm owners can allow, is for their guns to end up in SAPS storage. Because then they may as well just hand those weapons directly to criminals. The end result will be the same.

This is why tomorrow’s court case is so important. It isn’t just about firearm rights: it is about civil rights. If we can put a dent in the authoritarian overreach by an organisation who thinks it should write laws as opposed to only enforcing them, then there is still hope for our country. The SAPS tells us they don’t want to make an enemy of the public. Everything they have thus far done to blunder through this crisis has succeeded in making an enemy of the public.

Remember one very important thing: the excuse of “I was just following orders” didn’t save a single member of the Gestapo or SS from the rope at Nuremberg. Those who stand in opposition to us must be very careful on which side of history they choose to be. Because time is running out.

 


Written by Gideon Joubert

Gideon is owner and editor of Paratus

civil rightsexpired firearm licencefirearm licenceGOSAgun rightsgunsSAPSsouth africa
Share

6

You may also like

View Post

Automatic Weapons, Explosives Found in JHB. Blame Gun Owners Again?

View Post

New Firearm Amnesty – Serious Concerns and Questions

View Post

Magistrate Tears Into FCA Amendment Bill

View Post

Trust Broken: Negotiating Gun Laws With Government

View Post

Man Arrested and Fined R10K for Expired Firearm Licence: The Facts

View Post

Parliamentary Portfolio Committee’s plan to do “gun control” the right way

View Post

Gun Owners SA is going to the Constitutional Court

View Post

Do we need another firearm amnesty?

  1. Shadrack
    •
    7 years ago

    That’s good news I wish to see more people becoming members so that’s we can belong under one big umbrella I want to say thanks to you guys for working so hard.

  2. Marcelle Joubert
    •
    7 years ago

    What procedure needs to be followed in the case where the legal gun owner passed away and the gun wasn’t left to a specific person in the will?

    1. Zoo Keeper
      •
      7 years ago

      It goes into the estate. Whoever gets that portion gets the gun i suppose

  3. Andre de villiers
    •
    7 years ago

    Good day.
    Thanks for this.
    Just a qeustion. I renew my licence late but still do have my green licence. Does this mean that I still have to renew my licence. If so wil the SAPS make use of my old declined application or must I make a new application.
    Thanks again
    Andre

    1. Zoo Keeper
      •
      7 years ago

      Talk to GOSA, but on the face of green licenses are valid for life

  4. Alan
    •
    7 years ago

    The problem with SAP (S) is that since time immortal, they have been allowed to operate outside of the boundaries of what democratic countries law-enforcement are governed by and must adhere to.
    They have been allowed to operate as a “independant force”…and the previous Government and public allowed it to do, as it was acting in a dirty way ‘for our own good’.
    The end justified the means..even if people were slipping on soap or falling out of interrogation room windows.
    We didn’t want to know..and we have them a blank cheque. We also allowed them to write policies instead of just enforcing them.
    They don’t play clean..they don’t know how. And in a New Democracy, they still believe they are above the law that they are supposed to be enforcing.

    Adding an S to SAP was a whitewash. The institutional rot is so deep it runs right back to the training college where in a sober moment, a member might acknowledge that they are taught (off syllabus naturally) that ” it’s them and us”.
    Protect and SERVE doesn’t factor.

    And those very members who did the samboking all those years ago are still wearing the uniform.. The only difference is that now they have rank, and answer to a new set of political masters! And the drones they mentor are learning to fill their shoes.
    We need an Eliot Ness and his Untouchables. We need new brooms that sweep clean. We need to rebuild trust and we need a strong civil rights watchdog with teeth. Go GOSA.

Previous Post

GOSA Legal Team letter…

In General Discussion

GOSA Legal Team letter to SAPS

View Post

Next Post

What if I have both…

In Practical Advice

What if I have both a Green Card and White Card firearm licence?

View Post

About Paratus

Paratus

Paratus is a platform where you can read about the latest developments at the sharp-edge of the South African gun ownership debate.

Boeretroos Koffie

Social Media

Subscribe

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Popular Posts

View

PSIRA Amendments will Destroy Security Industry

April 3, 2025

View

Revisiting the Grey Man

May 11, 2025

Paratus

© 2025 Paratus - All Rights Reserved.