• Home
  • Articles
    • Firearm Rights
    • Practical Advice
    • Real-World Scenarios
    • General Discussion
    • Comic Relief
    • Reviews
    • Archive
  • Business Directory
  • Shop
    • View All Products
    • Basket
    • My account
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
  • What is Paratus?

Social Media

Latest Posts

View

Disarming Victims Won’t Fix our Violent Crime Crisis

February 22, 2023

View

Gun Owners Are Not to Blame for Mass Shootings

February 8, 2023

View

Are Old Handgun Combatives Instructors Still Relevant?

January 13, 2023

View

Reliability, Ergonomics & Lumens – Choosing your EDC Torch

September 23, 2022

 
0
Paratus
The Truth is our Weapon
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Firearm Rights
    • Practical Advice
    • Real-World Scenarios
    • General Discussion
    • Comic Relief
    • Reviews
    • Archive
  • Business Directory
  • Shop
    • View All Products
    • Basket
    • My account
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
  • What is Paratus?
Paratus
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Firearm Rights
    • Practical Advice
    • Real-World Scenarios
    • General Discussion
    • Comic Relief
    • Reviews
    • Archive
  • Business Directory
  • Shop
    • View All Products
    • Basket
    • My account
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
  • What is Paratus?
0

In Firearm Rights

Firearm Amnesty: repeating a dangerous mistake

November 16, 2017 5 Comments

Firearm Amnesty: repeating a dangerous mistake

We have all heard the rumours by now. The SAPS and the CFR have asked the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee for permission to implement another amnesty. This one will supposedly run from February until July 2018. Now, I apologise for not having any real concrete information to give you. As things stand, nobody yet knows exactly how this thing will play out. All that I do know, is that it is a bad idea. A really bad idea.

SAPS’s dismal custodianship of firearms

Let’s start with a quick recap regarding the SAPS’s woeful record as custodians of firearms. The police lost a grand total of 18 196 guns between April 2005 and March 2011. According to newer statistics, the SAPS lost 7 829 firearms between 2009 and 2014. Even though many of these guns are police service weapons, firearms were also lost from SAP 13 evidence lockers and stores. Furthermore, back in 2012 the DA’s Dianne Kohler-Barnard estimated that approximately 14 000 SAPS guns were in criminal hands.

Just this year alone there have been a series of high-profile cases of SAPS firearms finding their way to criminals. The most infamous examples pertain to the theft of 35 firearms from Bellville South and Mitchell’s Plain police stations. Criminals also stole numerous R5 automatic rifles from various SAPS stations.

In order to contrast how citizens and the SAPS compare regarding firearm custodianship, I investigated the different rates at which civilians and police lose firearms. The conclusion was enlightening. The SAPS lose approximately 8 times as many firearms per capita as civilians do. Even more interesting, lost and stolen civilian firearms are recovered at an annual rate 15 times greater than SAPS guns. You can read into the latter what you will.

It should be obvious that the SAPS does not have a particularly good reputation regarding its custodianship of firearms at all. Yet this is the organisation that is entrusted with the successful implementation of a firearm amnesty. But more of that in a moment.

Amnesty guns leaked to criminals

Most of you will by now be familiar with the misadventures of former SAPS colonel Chris Prinsloo. Colonel Prinsloo recently received an 18 year sentence for selling police guns to criminal gangs. He was a busy man who succeeded in supplying more than 2400 firearms to criminals over an 8-year period, with many of the guns being SAPS service weapons. However, some of the firearms were weapons that citizens handed in during the previous amnesty. Until the SAPS coerced the owners of these guns to hand them over, they were safe and sound in lawful civilian hands.

The Western Cape Crime Intelligence Unit positively linked 1066 murders to some of these guns. This development completely turns GFSA’s “If your stolen gun was there, so were you” ad-campaign on its head. Considering that the previous amnesty was very much GFSA’s creation, it is ironic that they have thus far taken zero responsibility for its aftermath. It is easy to blame firearm owners who have their guns stolen by criminals as being complicit in the crimes committed with those guns. But it is clearly a lot harder when your amnesty causes the exact same result. What is good for the goose, should be good for the gander. “If your amnesty gun was there, so was GFSA?”

What exactly will this amnesty achieve?

As healthy, rational individuals we all know that criminals will not jump at this chance to surrender their illegally-held guns, turn over a new leaf, and become upstanding and productive citizens. Not even our out-of-touch politicians will entertain such ridiculous flights of fancy. But here we are, supposedly on the brink of launching another firearm amnesty.

A further problem is that only the SAPS can administer the amnesty. The exact same organisation that loses 8 times more guns per capita than civilians. The exact same organisation who recovers their own lost guns at a rate 15 times lower than that of civilian firearms. And, to put the cherry on top, the exact same organisation whose members sold thousands upon thousands of guns to criminals. Whether or not they even have the personnel and real estate capacity to pull this off is another question entirely.

Clearly nothing can possibly go wrong here.

If this amnesty will not result in the large-scale removal of criminally-held firearms from society, what is the point? If there is a high risk that the people who administrate the amnesty will leak the surrendered firearms to criminals, we are creating a bigger problem and not a solution.

We are making the same mistake

The supposed reason for the amnesty, is that people with expired licences can hand their guns in to the SAPS and then reapply. This doesn’t make any sense. Why not simply allow the expired licence holders to just reapply anyway? Their details reflect on the CFR’s database, so there is absolutely no reason to do things in this convoluted manner. The amnesty also defies Judge Tolmay’s court order which expressly states that all expired licences remain valid. Stubborn pigheaded refusal by the SAPS and CFR to comply with the ruling’s interim order is causing this mess. It is ironic that they are trying to dress the amnesty up as a concession of goodwill.

This amnesty will not make South Africa a safer country. I don’t think it is even intended to. What it will achieve, is to possibly circulate more arms to criminals. Again. It will sucker people into surrendering their lawfully-held property to the SAPS. Again. It will turn more people into soft targets by disarming them. Again.

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. No, Albert Einstein did not in fact say that. But it is clever enough that he may just as well have. May sanity prevail.


Written by Gideon Joubert.

Gideon is the owner and editor of Paratus.

amnestyfirearm amnestyfirearm rightsgun rightsSAPSsouth africa
Share

5

You may also like

View Post

Armed Women – Guns are the Answer to Violence (a rebuttal)

View Post

The Rise of the Anti-Everything Club

View Post

Parliamentary Portfolio Committee’s plan to do “gun control” the right way

View Post

Back to Basics: What is It?

View Post

What if I have both a Green Card and White Card firearm licence?

View Post

Farm Attacks: You Are The Solution

View Post

Oscar Pistorius and the question of firearm ownership.

View Post

Tactics for Dummies Part 1 – Body Armour

  1. Gina
    •
    5 years ago

    Are expired fun licenses still valid?

  2. Gina
    •
    5 years ago

    Sorry are expired gun licenses still valid?

  3. Martin Hedington
    •
    5 years ago

    Just got this Heads up from the PMG.

    M_tu

    Parliamentary Monitoring Group

    Committees and Meetings

    MPs Bills Questions and Replies Calls for Comments

    Attendance

    Committees Police Committee Meetings
    Firearm Amnesty 2018; IT plan of action: SAPS briefing
    Police

    08 November 2017

    Chairperson: Mr F Beukman (ANC)

    Share this page:
    Access to this committee meeting report and those for the committees below is restricted. All other committees are freely accessible.

    The following users are exempt from a subscription fee. Please log in using an email address that identifies your affiliation to one of these:

    Non-government and community-based organisations
    Public education institutions

  4. Peter Moss
    •
    5 years ago

    Hear! hear! We need to open our eyes and smell the brown stuff it is not coffee.

    At no point in time do the SAPS consult or take seriously firearm owners. There is a simple reason for this and it is our own fault. When somebody stands on your toe you do not just stand there grinning like an idiot pretending nothing is happening. That is exactly what firearm owners do. It is not entirely their fault because many belong to firearm organisations who have a fiduciary duty to protect the reason for their existence. When government messes with firearm owners in order to decrease that number it is every firearm organisations duty to defend against that. The only people who argue that is the officials who would abdicate this duty.

    An attack on any firearm owner or section of ownership requires a combined effort in rejection. Only idiots cannot see the sense of that.

    The real question is when are firearm organisations going to see the writing on the wall and get off their complacent bums and organise that opposition.

    It is a fact of political life that if you cannot influence politics you have nothing to negotiate with or respect. You want respect earn it by showing what you value and what you will fight for. Nothing less will do. An as I once heard for the combined effort a strongly worded letter is not good enough in fact meaningless if you cannot male it stick.

    Nobody is asking what is your Saturday fun worth, what is your hunting trip worth or those championship points worth. The bottom line here cannot be denied, it is the safety of your family and yourself. Is that worth making an effort that government not being possessed of to many bright people can count heads. Counting heads is a good way of evaluation. Only people who know what they want and are willing to object and fight for it will be there to be counted. The rest are useless and immaterial not having the guts to stand up and fight for what is a human right.

  5. Tony
    •
    5 years ago

    I agree 100% with your article and hope sanity will prevail among decision makers in this regard. They should learn from past mistakes and stop harassing legal gun owners. Instead they should focus their efforts on criminals.

Previous Post

"But it's just for…

In Comic Relief

"But it's just for Self Defence" - problems with online advice

View Post

Next Post

Preparing Yourself For Your Next…

In Practical Advice

Preparing Yourself For Your Next Training Course

View Post

About Paratus

Paratus

Paratus is a platform where you can read about the latest developments at the sharp-edge of the South African gun ownership debate.

Boeretroos Koffie

Social Media

Subscribe

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Popular Posts

View

Gun Owners Are Not to Blame for Mass Shootings

February 8, 2023

View

Disarming Victims Won’t Fix our Violent Crime Crisis

February 22, 2023

View

Are Old Handgun Combatives Instructors Still Relevant?

January 13, 2023

Paratus

© 2023 Paratus - All Rights Reserved.